1NCE's $14 Lifetime Plan: When the Math Works and When It Doesn't
$14 for ten years of cellular connectivity. In an industry where $2-5 per month is standard, 1NCE’s pricing looks like either a typo or a trap.
It’s neither. But it’s also not the universal cost-killer it appears to be on first glance. I’ve watched teams commit to 1NCE based on the headline price, only to burn through their entire data allocation in 18 months with firmware updates they hadn’t planned for. I’ve also seen companies save hundreds of thousands of dollars over a deployment lifecycle because their use case fit the model perfectly.
The difference between those outcomes isn’t luck. It’s math. Specifically, whether your deployment parameters align with the narrow optimization target 1NCE has designed around.
This isn’t a vendor endorsement or a hit piece. It’s a scenario-based analysis to help you determine whether 1NCE’s unconventional model delivers genuine value for your specific deployment, or whether it’ll cost you more in workarounds and migrations than you saved on the headline price.
How 1NCE’s Pricing Model Actually Works
The core offering: 500MB of data, 250 SMS, valid for 10 years, at a one-time cost. Pricing varies by region, approximately €10 in the EU, $14-18 in North America. Verify current rates before committing, as these have shifted.
The network backbone runs through Deutsche Telekom infrastructure with roaming agreements covering 100+ countries. Coverage quality is strongest in the EU and North America, with meaningful gaps in parts of Latin America, Africa, and Southeast Asia. “Coverage” on a map doesn’t mean “reliable coverage for your specific deployment location,” a distinction that matters.
The business model logic is straightforward: 1NCE is betting on prepaid bulk economics and low-data use cases. If your device uses 50MB over ten years, they’ve allocated you 10x headroom while collecting payment upfront. The low-touch support model keeps operational costs minimal.
The critical detail many buyers miss: 500MB is your lifetime allocation, not an annual renewal. There’s no monthly reset. Once it’s gone, it’s gone, and topping up changes the economics entirely.
When the Math Works: Ideal Use Cases
Let’s run real numbers.
Scenario 1: Asset Tracking
A GPS tracker pinging location every 4 hours transmits roughly 200-300 bytes per message. That’s approximately 500KB per year.
- 10-year consumption: ~5MB
- 1NCE allocation: 500MB
- Utilization: 1% of available data
- Cost: $14 ÷ 10 years = $1.40/year
Compare this to Hologram at roughly $2-5/month for low-data plans, or traditional carrier IoT plans at similar rates. Over ten years, you’re looking at $240-600 versus $14. The math isn’t close.
Scenario 2: Environmental Sensors
A temperature/humidity sensor reporting daily readings transmits perhaps 100-200 bytes per transmission.
- Annual consumption: ~50-75KB
- 10-year consumption: ~500KB-750KB
- 1NCE allocation headroom: 650x-1000x
This is the sweet spot 1NCE designed for.
Scenario 3: Smart Meters
Utility meters with monthly automated readings plus occasional on-demand queries might use 50-100KB annually.
- 10-year consumption: ~500KB-1MB
- Comfortable margin with room for unexpected reads
The pattern: Devices that report small payloads infrequently, have predictable data consumption, deploy in well-covered regions, and have long operational lifecycles. If your deployment genuinely fits this profile, 1NCE likely offers the lowest total cost of ownership available in the market.
When the Math Breaks: Problem Scenarios
The same pricing model that delivers exceptional value for low-data devices becomes a liability when deployment parameters shift.
Scenario 1: Firmware OTA Requirements
This is where I’ve seen teams get burned most often.
A modest firmware update of 2MB compressed consumes four years of “sweet spot” budget in a single transmission. Two updates over the device lifecycle and you’ve used 80% of your lifetime allocation on maintenance alone, leaving minimal headroom for actual operational data.
If your product roadmap includes feature updates, security patches, or bug fixes delivered over-the-air, factor this into your consumption projections. Some teams solve this by designing OTA systems that diff against existing firmware, reducing update sizes to tens of kilobytes. But that requires upfront engineering investment.
Scenario 2: High-Frequency Telemetry
Industrial monitoring applications often require 1-minute or even 30-second reporting intervals. Let’s run the math:
- 200-byte payload every minute: ~105MB/year
- 500MB allocation exhausted in: ~4.7 years
You’ve paid for 10 years of connectivity but run dry before the halfway point. At this consumption rate, traditional per-MB pricing from Hologram or Soracom often becomes more economical, especially when you factor in the cost of physical SIM replacement for distributed devices.
Scenario 3: Coverage Gaps
1NCE lists 100+ countries, but listing and reliability aren’t synonymous. Teams deploying in Brazil, Indonesia, parts of Africa, or secondary cities in APAC frequently discover that partner network quality is inconsistent or absent entirely in their specific locations.
Urban coverage might be excellent while rural or industrial sites, often exactly where IoT sensors deploy, have degraded connectivity or none at all. The $14 price means nothing if your devices can’t connect.
Scenario 4: Evolving Requirements
This one hurts because it’s often invisible during pilot phases.
Your pilot devices fit the model perfectly at 200KB/year. Then product requirements evolve: marketing wants more frequent location updates, engineering adds a new sensor stream, operations requests diagnostic logging. Suddenly you’re at 2MB/year, and your production deployment is locked into SIMs designed for 1/10th that consumption.
Mid-deployment migration isn’t just buying new SIMs. It’s physical swaps across potentially thousands of distributed devices.
The pattern: Variable data needs, firmware-heavy products, global deployments with emerging market exposure, or early-stage products where requirements aren’t locked. If any of these apply, proceed carefully.
Hidden Risks Beyond Pricing
Even when the consumption math works, other factors belong in your evaluation.
Coverage Depth vs. Breadth
1NCE’s coverage map shows presence in 100+ countries, but “coverage” varies dramatically. Partner networks may provide urban-only reach, or IoT traffic may be deprioritized relative to consumer traffic during congestion. Verify coverage quality at your specific deployment locations, not just country-level presence.
Network Sunset Exposure
A 10-year commitment meets the reality of 2G/3G network shutdowns. 1NCE’s focus on LTE-M and NB-IoT mitigates this, since these networks have longer runways, but doesn’t eliminate it entirely. If your devices are 2G-dependent or deploy in regions where LTE-M/NB-IoT rollout is incomplete, factor sunset risk into your timeline.
Migration Complexity
1NCE SIMs are locked. If you outgrow the model in year 3, you’re looking at physical SIM swaps across your entire deployment. For 50 devices in a lab, that’s an afternoon of annoyance. For 10,000 devices distributed across warehouses, vehicles, or remote infrastructure, that’s a significant operational cost that can dwarf your original connectivity “savings.”
Support Model Trade-offs
Low-touch support enables low pricing. If your team has deep cellular expertise and rarely needs vendor escalation, this is fine. If you’re likely to need responsive technical support for integration issues or coverage troubleshooting, the support model may frustrate you.
“Lifetime” Ambiguity
What happens at year 10? Renewal terms aren’t prominently documented. For devices with 15-20 year expected operational lives, this creates planning uncertainty.
None of these are dealbreakers. All of them belong in your risk register for production deployments.
Competitive Landscape: How Alternatives Position
The IoT connectivity market has segmented. Direct comparison requires matching provider optimization to your specific parameters.
Hologram charges more per megabyte but delivers global coverage consistency, an excellent developer experience, and flexible data pooling across devices. Better for: unpredictable data needs, truly global deployments, developer-centric teams who value tooling.
Soracom offers an AWS-like pay-as-you-go model with sophisticated network services (Beam, Funnel, Junction) for edge processing and data routing. Better for: technically sophisticated deployments, Japan/APAC primary markets, teams wanting programmable network behavior.
Telnyx provides competitive per-MB rates with an API-first approach, strongest in US and EU markets. Better for: teams wanting carrier-grade infrastructure with startup-style flexibility.
KPN IoT offers deep European regional coverage with incumbent reliability. Better for: EU-primary deployments wanting single-carrier simplicity.
KORE focuses on enterprise managed services with white-glove support. Better for: large-scale deployments where operational support matters more than per-unit cost.
Telenor IoT specializes in Nordic and maritime deployments with managed connectivity services. Better for: Scandinavian/EU deployments, energy and maritime verticals.
Telstra IoT dominates APAC coverage. Better for: Australia and Asia-Pacific primary deployments.
Sierra Wireless (Semtech) bundles hardware and connectivity. Better for: teams wanting integrated module-to-cloud solutions without managing multiple vendors.
Cubic Telecom specializes in automotive and mobility. Better for: connected vehicle and mobility-specific use cases.
The insight here isn’t that one provider is “best.” 1NCE optimized for low-data/long-life while others optimized for flexibility, coverage breadth, or vertical specialization. The right choice depends entirely on your deployment parameters.
Note: Pricing in this market shifts frequently. Verify current rates directly with providers before making commitments.
Decision Framework: Evaluating Your Fit
Work through these questions honestly:
Data Consumption: Can you confidently project ≤50MB/year? This provides 10x margin over a 10-year horizon for the unexpected.
Update Requirements: How will you handle firmware updates? Can you architect for minimal OTA payload sizes, or will you need multi-megabyte updates?
Geographic Scope: Map your specific deployment locations against 1NCE coverage. Verify partner network quality, not just presence on a map.
Lifecycle Certainty: Is your device designed for 5+ year operation with stable requirements, or might product needs evolve significantly?
Support Needs: Does your team have cellular troubleshooting expertise, or will you need responsive vendor support during integration and deployment?
Migration Cost: If the model stops working in year 3, what’s the realistic cost of SIM replacement across your deployment scale?
Score yourself: 5-6 confident “yes” answers suggests a strong fit. 3-4 means evaluate carefully with pilot deployments before production commitment. Fewer than 3 suggests you’ll likely find better alternatives optimized for your actual parameters.
The Honest Take
1NCE isn’t cheap connectivity. It’s specialized connectivity. The pricing isn’t magic; it’s optimization for a specific deployment profile: low-data, long-lifecycle, predictable consumption, strong coverage regions.
For the right use case, 1NCE delivers genuinely unmatched unit economics. A $1.40/year connectivity cost for asset trackers fundamentally changes what’s viable to build.
For the wrong use case, you’ll spend more on workarounds, top-ups, and eventual migrations than you saved on the headline price.
Map your specific parameters before committing. If you’re uncertain, and if your deployment is substantial enough that being wrong is expensive, pilot with a small batch in your actual deployment conditions before production commitment. The $14 price point makes pilot testing cheap. Getting locked into the wrong connectivity model for 10,000 devices is not.
Hubble Network connects devices directly to satellites using standard Bluetooth chips—no cellular infrastructure decisions required. See how it works →